Best when you are confident building the process yourself.
You keep maximum control and cost down, but reminders, records, letters, evidence and legislative updates are yours to organise.
Compare your options
The useful comparison is not a giant tick-box table against anonymous competitors. It is which operating model gives you the right balance of control, support and ongoing cost.
| DIY alone | Landlord Buddy | Full management | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control of day-to-day decisions | High | High | Shared / lower |
| Software and structured workflows | You arrange it | Included | Agent systems |
| Your own tenancy evidence record | You build it | Built as you work | Depends on agent access |
| Human help when something goes wrong | You source it | Available when needed | Part of the management relationship |
| Ongoing cost | Lowest software cost, highest personal input | Fixed membership + optional extras | Usually a percentage of rent + extras |
| Who runs the routine | You | You, with the tools behind you | Agent |
You keep maximum control and cost down, but reminders, records, letters, evidence and legislative updates are yours to organise.
Use the workspace for the routine, keep the evidence as you go, then buy support or move to management only when you actually need it.
A letting agent takes on more of the routine for an ongoing fee. For some landlords that convenience is exactly the point.
Compare the cost with your own rent
Use the calculator rather than relying on a headline percentage. Add your actual management fee and extras, then compare that with the Landlord Buddy plan and one-off services you would realistically use.
Open the management cost calculator →The third option